massachusetts: is smartest state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.63
, connecticut
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, boston
Weight: 0.62
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is smartest state 1.00
is best state 0.81
is healthiest state 0.77
be best state live 0.77
be best state live in 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(connecticut, is best state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is smartest state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is smartest state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is best state)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is best state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be best state live)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be best state live in)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(connecticut, is best state)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is smartest state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is smartest state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(maryland, is best state)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(maryland, is best state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(new hampshire, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be best state live in)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(new hampshire, be best state live)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be best state live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(massachusetts, is smartest state)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is best state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is healthiest state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be best state live)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be best state live in)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is best state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is best state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(massachusetts, is best state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be best state live in)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be best state live in)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(massachusetts, be best state live in)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(massachusetts, be best state live)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(massachusetts, is healthiest state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be best state live)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be best state live)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, is healthiest state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is healthiest state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(massachusetts, is smartest state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be best state live in)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(maryland, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be best state live)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(massachusetts, is smartest state)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best state)