massachusetts: was colonized

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.63
, connecticut
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, boston
Weight: 0.62
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was colonized 1.00
was important colony 0.76
was colony 0.76
be better than colonies 0.76
was better than rest of colonies 0.75
is colony 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pennsylvania, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was colonized)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(connecticut, is colony)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was colonized)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was colonized)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is colony)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was colonized)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is colony)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was colonized)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was colonized)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maryland, is colony)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was colonized)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is colony)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pennsylvania, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was colonized)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(connecticut, is colony)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was colonized)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(new york city, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(new york city, was colonized)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(new hampshire, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was colonized)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(maryland, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(maryland, was colonized)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(new hampshire, is colony)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is colony)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(maryland, is colony)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(maryland, is colony)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was colonized)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was important colony)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colony)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be better than colonies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was better than rest of colonies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was colony)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was colony)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be better than colonies)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was better than rest of colonies)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was colony)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be better than colonies)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(massachusetts, be better than colonies)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was better than rest of colonies)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was better than rest of colonies)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was important colony)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was important colony)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was important colony)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was colonized)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was colonized)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(connecticut, is colony)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(new york city, was colonized)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was colonized)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(maryland, was colonized)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is colony)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(maryland, is colony)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was colonized)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(massachusetts, was colonized)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(connecticut, is colony)