massachusetts: was formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.63
, connecticut
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, boston
Weight: 0.62
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was formed 1.00
was established 0.83
was founded 0.81
were founded 0.80
was started 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(pennsylvania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pennsylvania, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pennsylvania, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(connecticut, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was established)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(new york, was started)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new england, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was started)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was started)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was established)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was established)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was established)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was founded)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was started)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was started)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new england, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was started)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(boston, was founded)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, was formed)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was started)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was established)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(pennsylvania, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pennsylvania, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pennsylvania, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(connecticut, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was formed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(maryland, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(west virginia, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(west virginia, was formed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(new hampshire, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was established)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was founded)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new york city, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new york city, was started)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(boston, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(boston, was founded)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(maryland, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(maryland, was founded)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(maryland, was started)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(west virginia, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(west virginia, was founded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was formed)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was established)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was founded)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, were founded)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was started)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was started)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was established)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was founded)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(massachusetts, were founded)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was established)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, were founded)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was founded)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was established)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(massachusetts, were founded)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new york, was started)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was formed)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(connecticut, was started)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was started)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was established)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was founded)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(connecticut, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was formed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was established)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was founded)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york city, was started)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(west virginia, was formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(maryland, was started)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(boston, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(maryland, was founded)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(west virginia, was founded)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new york, was started)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was formed)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(connecticut, was started)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was started)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was established)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was founded)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(connecticut, was established)