massachusetts: was named massachusetts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.63
, connecticut
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, boston
Weight: 0.62
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was named massachusetts 1.00
be named massachusetts 0.99
be called massachusetts 0.94
be named after virgin mary 0.75
be named same 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be named after virgin mary)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(maryland, be named after virgin mary)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(maryland, be named after virgin mary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be named massachusetts)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be named massachusetts)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be called massachusetts)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be called massachusetts)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be named massachusetts)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be called massachusetts)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(massachusetts, be named massachusetts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(massachusetts, be called massachusetts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was named massachusetts)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(maryland, be named after virgin mary)