massachusetts: was settled

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.63
, connecticut
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, boston
Weight: 0.62
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was settled 1.00
be good place settle 0.84
be good place settle in time 0.83
be good place settle in colonial time 0.78
was better suited for settlement 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was settled)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(connecticut, was settled)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was settled)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was settled)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was settled)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(new england, was settled)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was settled)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(new england, was settled)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was settled)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was settled)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was settled)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was settled)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was settled)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new england, was settled)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was settled)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was settled)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was settled)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pennsylvania, was settled)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(connecticut, was settled)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was settled)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(new england, was settled)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(new hampshire, was settled)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was settled)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(maryland, was settled)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(maryland, was settled)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was settled)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be good place settle)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be good place settle in time)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was better suited for settlement)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, be good place settle in colonial time)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(massachusetts, be good place settle)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(massachusetts, be good place settle in time)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be good place settle in time)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be good place settle)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(massachusetts, be good place settle in colonial time)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was better suited for settlement)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, be good place settle in colonial time)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be good place settle in time)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was better suited for settlement)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be good place settle in colonial time)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(massachusetts, be good place settle)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was better suited for settlement)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was settled)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was settled)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new england, was settled)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(connecticut, was settled)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was settled)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was settled)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(maryland, was settled)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was settled)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(new england, was settled)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(connecticut, was settled)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(massachusetts, was settled)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was settled)