massachusetts: was started

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.63
, connecticut
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, boston
Weight: 0.62
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was started 1.00
was formed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, was started)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was started)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(connecticut, was started)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was started)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, was started)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was started)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(pennsylvania, was formed)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was started)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was started)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was started)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(new york, was started)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was started)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was started)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was started)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was started)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was formed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was started)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was started)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, was formed)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, was started)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(connecticut, was started)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, was started)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(pennsylvania, was formed)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was started)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new york city, was started)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new york city, was started)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(maryland, was started)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(maryland, was started)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new hampshire, was formed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, was formed)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(west virginia, was formed)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(west virginia, was formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was started)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(massachusetts, was formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was started)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new york, was started)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(connecticut, was started)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was started)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york city, was started)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new hampshire, was formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(maryland, was started)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(west virginia, was formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new york, was started)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(connecticut, was started)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was started)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(massachusetts, was started)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was formed)