massage: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents modality
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.58
, practice
Weight: 0.58
, method
Weight: 0.58
Siblings reflexology
Weight: 0.54
, acupuncture
Weight: 0.35
, yoga
Weight: 0.34
, chiropractic
Weight: 0.34
, relaxation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is quality 0.87
be bad in bulgaria 0.87
has quality wrong 0.87
is ungiven good 0.83
be good for health 0.77
be good for business 0.76
be in bad weather 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(massage, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(massage, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(massage, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(massage, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(massage, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(massage, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(massage, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(massage, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(practice, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(practice, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(reflexology, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(yoga, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(yoga, be good for health)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(massage, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(massage, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(massage, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(massage, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(massage, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(massage, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(massage, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(practice, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(massage, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chiropractic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(chiropractic, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(acupuncture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(acupuncture, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(reflexology, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(reflexology, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(yoga, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(yoga, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(yoga, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(yoga, be good for health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(massage, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(massage, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(massage, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(massage, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(massage, be good for health)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(massage, be good for health)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(massage, be good for health)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(massage, be good for health)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(massage, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chiropractic, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(acupuncture, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(reflexology, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(yoga, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(yoga, be good for health)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(massage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(practice, be good for business)