master: be in chemical engineering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents title
Weight: 0.64
, degree
Weight: 0.62
, teacher
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.60
Siblings stephen king
Weight: 0.63
, edward weston
Weight: 0.52
, frank stella
Weight: 0.52
, realist
Weight: 0.36
, instructor
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in chemical engineering 1.00
be in engineering 0.92
engineering 0.91
be in mechanical engineering 0.88
be in civil engineering 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(master, be in chemical engineering)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(master, be in engineering)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(master, engineering)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(master, be in engineering)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(master, engineering)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(master, be in civil engineering)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(master, be in mechanical engineering)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(master, be in engineering)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(master, engineering)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(master, be in civil engineering)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(master, engineering)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(master, be in engineering)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(master, be in mechanical engineering)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(master, be in mechanical engineering)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(master, be in mechanical engineering)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(master, be in civil engineering)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(master, be in civil engineering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(master, be in chemical engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(master, be in chemical engineering)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(master, be in chemical engineering)