masturbation: has quality better

Related concepts

Parents	sexual activity Weight: 0.74 , sin Weight: 0.63 , evil Weight: 0.63 , topic Weight: 0.62 , activity Weight: 0.62
Siblings	sexual intercourse Weight: 0.66 , sex Weight: 0.38 , sexual assault Weight: 0.37 , unprotected sex Weight: 0.36 , orgasm Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality better	1.00
has quality bad	0.90
has quality wrong	0.83
be good for system	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(evil, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(masturbation, has quality better)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(evil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(masturbation, has quality better)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(sin, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(masturbation, has quality better)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(sin, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(masturbation, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(sin, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(evil, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(sin, has quality wrong)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(evil, has quality wrong)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality wrong)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality wrong)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(sex, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(sex, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(evil, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(masturbation, has quality better)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(evil, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(masturbation, has quality better)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(sin, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(masturbation, has quality better)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(sin, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(masturbation, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(sex, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(sex, has quality bad)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(sex, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(sex, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(masturbation, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(masturbation, has quality bad)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(masturbation, has quality bad)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(masturbation, has quality bad)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(masturbation, has quality wrong)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(masturbation, has quality wrong)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(masturbation, has quality wrong)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(masturbation, be good for system)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(masturbation, be good for system)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(masturbation, be good for system)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality wrong)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, be good for system)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(masturbation, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(sin, has quality bad)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(sin, has quality wrong)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(evil, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(sex, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(sex, has quality wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(sin, has quality bad)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(sin, has quality wrong)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(masturbation, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(evil, has quality wrong)