math book: is written

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents book
Weight: 0.74
, textbook
Weight: 0.61
, reading
Weight: 0.49
, problem
Weight: 0.39
Siblings reading book
Weight: 0.41
, phone book
Weight: 0.38
, blue book
Weight: 0.37
, autobiography
Weight: 0.36
, cookbook
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is written 1.00
is poorly written 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(book, is written)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(math book, is written)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(math book, is written)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(book, is written)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(math book, is written)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(book, is written)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(math book, is written)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(autobiography, is written)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(book, is written)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(math book, is written)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(math book, is written)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(math book, is written)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(autobiography, is written)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(autobiography, is written)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(math book, is written)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(math book, is written)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(math book, is written)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(math book, is poorly written)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(math book, is written)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(math book, is poorly written)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(math book, is written)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(math book, is poorly written)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(math book, is written)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(math book, is poorly written)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(math book, is written)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(math book, is written)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(math book, is written)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(math book, is written)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(math book, is written)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(math book, is written)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(book, is written)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(math book, is written)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(autobiography, is written)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(math book, is written)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(book, is written)