math: be more important than art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.61
, fundamental
Weight: 0.61
, elementary school
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, core
Weight: 0.59
Siblings calculus
Weight: 0.61
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.34
, kindergarten
Weight: 0.34
, science
Weight: 0.34
, science fiction
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more important than art 1.00
is art 0.87
relate with art 0.83
relate to art 0.83
be more important than english 0.79
string art 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(science, be more important than art)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(science, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(science, be more important than art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(math, be more important than art)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(math, is art)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, relate with art)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, relate to art)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(math, be more important than english)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(math, relate with art)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(math, string art)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(math, relate to art)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(math, string art)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(math, is art)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(math, string art)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(math, is art)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(math, relate with art)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(math, relate to art)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(math, be more important than english)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(math, is art)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(math, relate with art)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(math, relate to art)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(math, be more important than english)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(math, string art)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(math, be more important than english)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be more important than art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(math, be more important than art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be more important than art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(science, be more important than art)