math: be used in engineering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.61
, fundamental
Weight: 0.61
, elementary school
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, core
Weight: 0.59
Siblings calculus
Weight: 0.61
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.34
, kindergarten
Weight: 0.34
, science
Weight: 0.34
, science fiction
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in engineering 1.00
be important in engineering 0.95
be related to engineering 0.95
relate to engineering 0.90
be used in robotics engineering 0.89
be important to robotics engineering 0.87
be used in science 0.80
be used in biology 0.79
be related to sciences including physics chemistry 0.78
be used in computer science 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(science, be used in biology)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(calculus, be used in engineering)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(math, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(calculus, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(calculus, be used in engineering)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(math, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(science, be used in biology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(science, be used in biology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(math, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(math, be used in engineering)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(math, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be used in science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(math, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(math, be used in science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(math, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(math, be used in science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(math, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(math, be used in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(math, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(math, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be used in engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(math, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(math, be used in engineering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(calculus, be used in engineering)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(math, be used in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(science, be used in biology)