mathematics: be important to engineering science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.73
, computer science
Weight: 0.72
, math
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.64
, philosophy
Weight: 0.64
Siblings physics
Weight: 0.37
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.37
, biology
Weight: 0.37
, arithmetic
Weight: 0.37
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to engineering science 1.00
be important to science engineering 1.00
be important to science 0.91
play role in science engineering 0.91
be important in science 0.91
is science 0.90
be considered science 0.86
be related to computer science 0.84
related to computer science 0.84
field of science 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(math, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(math, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(philosophy, is science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(philosophy, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(computer science, is science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer science, is science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(math, is science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(philosophy, is science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(math, be important in science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(math, be important to science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be considered science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(philosophy, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be important in science)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, be considered science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, is science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, be important to science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be considered science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, is science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(math, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(physics, be considered science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, is science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(physics, is science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(philosophy, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(math, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(math, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(philosophy, is science)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(math, is science)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(computer science, is science)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(philosophy, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(computer science, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(physics, is science)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(physics, is science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, is science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biology, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(biology, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(biology, be considered science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(physics, be considered science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(physics, be considered science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mathematics, be important to engineering science)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to science engineering)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, is science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mathematics, be considered science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(mathematics, be important to science engineering)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, play role in science engineering)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(mathematics, be related to computer science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important in science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(mathematics, is science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(mathematics, play role in science engineering)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be considered science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(mathematics, be important to science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(mathematics, be important in science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(mathematics, be considered science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important in science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be considered science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, related to computer science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mathematics, related to computer science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be related to computer science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mathematics, be related to computer science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be related to computer science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mathematics, play role in science engineering)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to science engineering)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(mathematics, related to computer science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important to science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be important in science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(mathematics, play role in science engineering)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to science engineering)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mathematics, related to computer science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(math, is science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(math, be important in science)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(philosophy, is science)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(math, be important to science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(philosophy, be considered science)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(philosophy, be important in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biology, is science)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(physics, is science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(biology, be considered science)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(physics, be considered science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer science, is science)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(computer science, be considered science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(math, is science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(math, be important in science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(philosophy, is science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(math, be important to science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(philosophy, be considered science)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(mathematics, be important to engineering science)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(philosophy, be important in science)