mayonnaise: be in sydney sweet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sauce
Weight: 0.74
, product
Weight: 0.64
, olive oil
Weight: 0.63
, recipe
Weight: 0.60
, staple
Weight: 0.60
Siblings tartar sauce
Weight: 0.59
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.40
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.39
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in sydney sweet 1.00
be in sydney 0.93
be sweet 0.77
be in australia 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sauce, be sweet)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sauce, be sweet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sauce, be sweet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sauce, be sweet)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(mayonnaise, be in sydney)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mayonnaise, be in sydney)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(mayonnaise, be in sydney)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(mayonnaise, be in sydney)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sauce, be sweet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(mayonnaise, be in sydney sweet)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sauce, be sweet)