mcdonald: has double cheeseburgers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has double cheeseburgers 1.00
has cheeseburgers 0.96
has hamburgers 0.82
has burgers 0.81
has put pickles on burgers 0.79
has fries 0.79
is fries 0.79
give fries 0.77
has put onions on burgers 0.77
give free fries 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is fries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has put onions on burgers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has put onions on burgers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has put onions on burgers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has hamburgers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has burgers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has put onions on burgers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has fries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has put pickles on burgers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mcdonald, is fries)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has fries)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is fries)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has fries)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has fries)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(mcdonald, give free fries)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, give free fries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has double cheeseburgers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is fries)