mcdonald: has ice cream machine

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has ice cream machine 1.00
has ice cream machines 0.97
has ice cream spoons 0.87
has machine 0.81
be dirty ice 0.79
charge for ice 0.78
is milkshake machine broken 0.77
is milkshake machine 0.77
put ice in urinal 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mcdonald, has ice cream machine)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has ice cream machine)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mcdonald, has ice cream machine)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has ice cream machines)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mcdonald, has ice cream machine)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has ice cream machines)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mcdonald, has ice cream machine)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has ice cream machines)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mcdonald, has ice cream machine)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has ice cream spoons)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mcdonald, has ice cream machine)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has ice cream spoons)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mcdonald, has ice cream machine)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has ice cream spoons)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(mcdonald, has ice cream machine)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has ice cream machines)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(mcdonald, has ice cream machine)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has ice cream spoons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mcdonald, has ice cream machine)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has ice cream machine)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has ice cream machine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mcdonald, has ice cream machine)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has ice cream machine)