mcdonald: use plastic cups

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food chain
Weight: 0.65
, restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.62
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
use plastic cups 1.00
using styrofoam cups 0.92
has use styrofoam cups for tea 0.91
has shape cups 0.89
use metal chopsticks 0.79
has ice cream spoons 0.78
charge for paper bags 0.77
give black napkins 0.77
offer black napkins 0.77
use white plates 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, charge for paper bags)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mcdonalds, charge for paper bags)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, charge for paper bags)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(mcdonald, use plastic cups)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(mcdonald, using styrofoam cups)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has use styrofoam cups for tea)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, using styrofoam cups)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, using styrofoam cups)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has use styrofoam cups for tea)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mcdonald, using styrofoam cups)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has use styrofoam cups for tea)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has ice cream spoons)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has ice cream spoons)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has ice cream spoons)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has use styrofoam cups for tea)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has shape cups)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mcdonald, has ice cream spoons)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has shape cups)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(mcdonald, has shape cups)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has shape cups)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, use plastic cups)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mcdonald, use plastic cups)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, use plastic cups)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, charge for paper bags)