mcdonalds: be better in other countries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.68
, food chain
Weight: 0.66
, chain
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mcdonald
Weight: 0.37
, starbucks
Weight: 0.36
, taco bell
Weight: 0.35
, fast food
Weight: 0.35
, hey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better in other countries 1.00
be better in countries 0.98
taste better in other countries 0.93
taste different in other countries 0.90
taste better in countries 0.89
be successful in many countries around world 0.87
be successful in countries around world 0.87
taste different in different countries 0.87
taste different in countries 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be better in other countries)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, taste better in other countries)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, taste better in other countries)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, taste better in other countries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste better in other countries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, taste different in countries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, taste different in different countries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be successful in many countries around world)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, taste different in countries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, taste different in different countries)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be successful in many countries around world)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, taste different in countries)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, taste different in different countries)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be successful in many countries around world)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be successful in many countries around world)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste different in different countries)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, taste different in countries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be better in other countries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(mcdonalds, be better in other countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be better in other countries)