mcdonalds: be better than burger king

Property	Similarity
be better than burger king	1.00
be healthier than burger king	0.96
is burger	0.91
spit in burgers	0.82
put pickles on burgers	0.81
put gherkins in burgers	0.80
is fries	0.80
be fries	0.80
be fries really made	0.80
be fries made	0.79

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is burger)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is burger)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is burger)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be healthier than burger king)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be healthier than burger king)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is burger)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be healthier than burger king)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be healthier than burger king)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be fries)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be fries)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be fries)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is fries)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be fries)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is fries)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(mcdonalds, be better than burger king) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is fries)

Parents	fast food restaurant Weight: 0.73 , fast food chain Weight: 0.68 , food chain Weight: 0.66 , chain Weight: 0.65 , thing Weight: 0.63
Siblings	mcdonald Weight: 0.37 , starbucks Weight: 0.36 , taco bell Weight: 0.35 , fast food Weight: 0.35 , hey Weight: 0.35

mcdonalds: be better than burger king

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings