mcdonalds: be more expensive in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.68
, food chain
Weight: 0.66
, chain
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mcdonald
Weight: 0.37
, starbucks
Weight: 0.36
, taco bell
Weight: 0.35
, fast food
Weight: 0.35
, hey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive in canada 1.00
be expensive in canada 0.98
be expensive in france 0.83
is more expensive 0.79
is expensive 0.77
be green in europe 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(starbucks, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(starbucks, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be green in europe)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is more expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be expensive in france)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be green in europe)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be expensive in france)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is more expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be green in europe)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be green in europe)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be expensive in france)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is more expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is more expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be expensive in france)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(taco bell, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(starbucks, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)