mcdonalds: be more expensive on uber

Related concepts

Parents	fast food restaurant Weight: 0.73 , fast food chain Weight: 0.68 , food chain Weight: 0.66 , chain Weight: 0.65 , thing Weight: 0.63
Siblings	mcdonald Weight: 0.37 , starbucks Weight: 0.36 , taco bell Weight: 0.35 , fast food Weight: 0.35 , hey Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more expensive on uber	1.00
is more expensive	0.85
is expensive	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(starbucks, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(starbucks, is expensive)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(fast food, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(taco bell, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(taco bell, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber)

Similarity expansion

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is more expensive)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is more expensive)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is more expensive)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.35

Salient(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is more expensive)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is expensive)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is expensive)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is expensive)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

Salient(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

Salient(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(taco bell, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(starbucks, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(mcdonalds, be more expensive on uber) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)