mcdonalds: do monopoly

Related concepts

Parents	fast food restaurant Weight: 0.73 , fast food chain Weight: 0.68 , food chain Weight: 0.66 , chain Weight: 0.65 , thing Weight: 0.63
Siblings	mcdonald Weight: 0.37 , starbucks Weight: 0.36 , taco bell Weight: 0.35 , fast food Weight: 0.35 , hey Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
do monopoly	1.00
has state monopoly	0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, do monopoly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, has state monopoly)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(mcdonalds, do monopoly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(mcdonald, has state monopoly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(mcdonald, has state monopoly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(mcdonalds, do monopoly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(mcdonalds, do monopoly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(mcdonalds, do monopoly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, do monopoly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, do monopoly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(mcdonalds, do monopoly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(mcdonalds, do monopoly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, do monopoly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(mcdonald, has state monopoly)