mcdonalds: is addictive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.68
, food chain
Weight: 0.66
, chain
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mcdonald
Weight: 0.37
, starbucks
Weight: 0.36
, taco bell
Weight: 0.35
, fast food
Weight: 0.35
, hey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is addictive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is addictive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is addictive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is addictive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is addictive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mcdonalds, is addictive)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(fast food, is addictive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fast food, is addictive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mcdonalds, is addictive)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(taco bell, is addictive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is addictive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mcdonalds, is addictive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is addictive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(mcdonalds, is addictive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is addictive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is addictive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(mcdonalds, is addictive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is addictive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is addictive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fast food, is addictive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is addictive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(taco bell, is addictive)