mcdonalds: is successful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.68
, food chain
Weight: 0.66
, chain
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mcdonald
Weight: 0.37
, starbucks
Weight: 0.36
, taco bell
Weight: 0.35
, fast food
Weight: 0.35
, hey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is successful 1.00
be more successful than kfc 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is successful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fast food chain, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is successful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(food chain, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is successful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(food chain, is successful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(fast food chain, is successful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is successful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, is successful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is successful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is successful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is successful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is successful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is successful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fast food chain, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is successful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(food chain, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is successful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(starbucks, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(starbucks, is successful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(taco bell, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is successful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is successful)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be more successful than kfc)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be more successful than kfc)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be more successful than kfc)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be more successful than kfc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(food chain, is successful)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food chain, is successful)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(taco bell, is successful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(starbucks, is successful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(food chain, is successful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food chain, is successful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(mcdonalds, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is successful)