mcdonalds: put gherkins in burgers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.68
, food chain
Weight: 0.66
, chain
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mcdonald
Weight: 0.37
, starbucks
Weight: 0.36
, taco bell
Weight: 0.35
, fast food
Weight: 0.35
, hey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
put gherkins in burgers 1.00
put pickles on burgers 0.93
spit in burgers 0.88
is burger 0.84
be fries 0.83
is fries 0.83
be fries made 0.82
be fries really made 0.81
be better than burger king 0.80
add salt to fries 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is burger)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is burger)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is burger)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be fries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is burger)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be fries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be better than burger king)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, add salt to fries)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be better than burger king)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is fries)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, add salt to fries)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be fries)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be better than burger king)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be fries)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is fries)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, add salt to fries)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is fries)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be better than burger king)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, add salt to fries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is fries)