mcdonalds: put pickles on burgers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.68
, food chain
Weight: 0.66
, chain
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mcdonald
Weight: 0.37
, starbucks
Weight: 0.36
, taco bell
Weight: 0.35
, fast food
Weight: 0.35
, hey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
put pickles on burgers 1.00
put gherkins in burgers 0.93
spit in burgers 0.89
is burger 0.86
be fries 0.85
is fries 0.85
be fries made 0.85
be fries really made 0.84
add salt to fries 0.82
charge for condiments 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is burger)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is burger)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is burger)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is burger)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be fries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be fries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, add salt to fries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is fries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be fries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, add salt to fries)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be fries)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is fries)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is fries)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, charge for condiments)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, add salt to fries)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, add salt to fries)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, charge for condiments)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, charge for condiments)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, charge for condiments)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is fries)