mcdonalds: spit in burgers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.68
, food chain
Weight: 0.66
, chain
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mcdonald
Weight: 0.37
, starbucks
Weight: 0.36
, taco bell
Weight: 0.35
, fast food
Weight: 0.35
, hey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
spit in burgers 1.00
put pickles on burgers 0.89
put gherkins in burgers 0.88
is burger 0.86
be fries 0.83
is fries 0.83
be better than burger king 0.82
be fries made 0.82
be fries really made 0.81
be healthier than burger king 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(mcdonald, is fries)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mcdonald, is fries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is burger)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is burger)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is burger)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be fries)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be healthier than burger king)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is burger)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be better than burger king)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be fries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, put gherkins in burgers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be healthier than burger king)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, is fries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, be better than burger king)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, put pickles on burgers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(mcdonalds, is fries)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be fries)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be healthier than burger king)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be better than burger king)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be fries)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, is fries)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be healthier than burger king)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be better than burger king)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, is fries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, spit in burgers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mcdonald, is fries)