meaning: be related historically

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.62
, expression
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.59
, reason
Weight: 0.59
Siblings irony
Weight: 0.55
, bare
Weight: 0.33
, vocabulary
Weight: 0.33
, but
Weight: 0.32
, dimension
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related historically 1.00
be related 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(process, be related)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(meaning, be related historically)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(meaning, be related historically)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(process, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(meaning, be related historically)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(process, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(process, be related)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(meaning, be related historically)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(meaning, be related historically)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(meaning, be related historically)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(meaning, be related historically)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(meaning, be related historically)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(meaning, be related)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(meaning, be related historically)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(meaning, be related)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(meaning, be related historically)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(meaning, be related)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(meaning, be related historically)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(meaning, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(meaning, be related historically)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(meaning, be related historically)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(meaning, be related historically)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(meaning, be related historically)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(meaning, be related historically)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(meaning, be related historically)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(process, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(meaning, be related historically)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(process, be related)