meat: be at mcdonalds only kid

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, pork
Weight: 0.68
, tofu
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at mcdonalds only kid 1.00
be nice to eat 0.78
be defined as something you can cook and eat 0.78
be used to person to eat 0.76
be at fast-food resturaunt 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food resturaunt)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food resturaunt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast-food resturaunt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food resturaunt)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(meat, be used to person to eat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(meat, be used to person to eat)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(meat, be used to person to eat)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(meat, be used to person to eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast-food resturaunt)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(meat, be at mcdonalds only kid)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast-food resturaunt)