meat: be bad for body

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for body 1.00
help body 0.87
affect body 0.86
be good for teanages 0.79
be bad for environment 0.77
has quality bad 0.76
be bad for dogs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for body)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dairy product, help body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for body)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for body)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for body)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for body)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dairy product, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for body)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(dairy product, help body)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, help body)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be bad for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for body)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dairy product, help body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for body)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for body)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for body)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for body)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dairy product, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for body)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(lamb, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(lamb, be bad for dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lunch meat, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(beef, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(beef, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lunch meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hamburger, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(hamburger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(hamburger, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(meat, be bad for body)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(meat, help body)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(meat, be good for teanages)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meat, be good for teanages)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(meat, be good for teanages)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(meat, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(meat, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(meat, be good for teanages)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(meat, help body)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(meat, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(meat, help body)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(meat, help body)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for body)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(dairy product, help body)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lamb, be bad for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(beef, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lunch meat, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(hamburger, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(hamburger, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(dairy product, help body)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)