meat: be better than vegetables

Related concepts

Parents	dairy product Weight: 0.65 , frozen food Weight: 0.65 , food Weight: 0.65 , fast food Weight: 0.63 , raw material Weight: 0.63
Siblings	lunch meat Weight: 0.80 , hamburger Weight: 0.72 , lamb Weight: 0.71 , beef Weight: 0.69 , chicken Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be better than vegetables	1.00
be more expensive than vegetables	0.95
be more dangerous than vegetables	0.94
be tastier than vegetables	0.92
be more dangerous than raw vegetables	0.90
be more filling than vegetables	0.87
be better than chicken	0.83
be harder than other meats	0.83
be harder than meats	0.83
be more expensive than meat	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(meat, be better than vegetables)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(meat, be tastier than vegetables)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(meat, be tastier than vegetables)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(meat, be tastier than vegetables)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(meat, be more filling than vegetables)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Salient(meat, be better than chicken)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(meat, be more filling than vegetables)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(meat, be more filling than vegetables)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(meat, be tastier than vegetables)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(meat, be more filling than vegetables)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than vegetables)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(meat, be better than vegetables)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(beef, be better than chicken)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than meat)