meat: be expensive in turkey

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in turkey 1.00
be more expensive than meat 0.83
be more expensive than dark meat 0.81
be better than chicken 0.80
have meat 0.78
taste like chicken 0.78
be more expensive than vegetables 0.77
be called meat 0.77
be harder than meats 0.77
be harder than other meats 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chicken, have meat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, have meat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be called meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, have meat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beef, have meat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(beef, be better than chicken)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(beef, be better than chicken)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(lamb, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lamb, be called meat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(chicken, have meat)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chicken, have meat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(chicken, be called meat)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chicken, be called meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(meat, be expensive in turkey)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be better than chicken)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(meat, be better than chicken)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be better than chicken)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(meat, taste like chicken)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(meat, taste like chicken)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(meat, taste like chicken)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(meat, be better than chicken)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(meat, taste like chicken)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(meat, be more expensive than vegetables)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(meat, be expensive in turkey)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than meat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(beef, be better than chicken)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(beef, have meat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(lamb, be called meat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicken, have meat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive in turkey)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chicken, be called meat)