meat: cooked to raw

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
cooked to raw 1.00
is cooked 0.92
be cooked 0.92
has state raw 0.84
is is thawed before cooking 0.77
be tenderized 0.77
be marinated in wine 0.76
be eaten 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beef, be cooked)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be cooked)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(beef, be cooked)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(beef, be cooked)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(lamb, be cooked)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(lamb, be cooked)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(meat, cooked to raw)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(meat, is cooked)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(meat, be cooked)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(meat, is cooked)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(meat, be cooked)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(meat, has state raw)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(meat, has state raw)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(meat, be cooked)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(meat, is cooked)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(meat, be cooked)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(meat, is cooked)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(meat, be marinated in wine)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(meat, be marinated in wine)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(meat, has state raw)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(meat, be marinated in wine)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(meat, is is thawed before cooking)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(meat, be tenderized)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(meat, be marinated in wine)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(meat, be tenderized)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(meat, be tenderized)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(meat, be tenderized)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(meat, has state raw)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(meat, is is thawed before cooking)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(meat, is is thawed before cooking)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(meat, is is thawed before cooking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(meat, cooked to raw)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(meat, cooked to raw)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(beef, be cooked)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(meat, cooked to raw)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(lamb, be cooked)