meat: has state dark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state dark 1.00
turn dark in freezer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(beef, has state dark)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(meat, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(beef, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(beef, has state dark)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(meat, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(meat, has state dark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(meat, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(meat, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, has state dark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(meat, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(meat, has state dark)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, has state dark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(beef, has state dark)