meat: have more fat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
have more fat 1.00
has physical part fat 0.90
have more calories 0.81
have many calories 0.79
have calories 0.77
have zero carbs 0.77
be such small part of diet 0.77
be needed in diet 0.76
be important in diet 0.75
be in diet 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food, have many calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meat, have more fat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fast food, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meat, have more fat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fast food, have calories)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fast food, have many calories)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fast food, have many calories)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fast food, have calories)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, have calories)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food, have many calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(meat, have more fat)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fast food, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(meat, have more fat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(hamburger, have calories) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(hamburger, have calories)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(meat, have more fat)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meat, has physical part fat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(meat, has physical part fat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(meat, has physical part fat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(meat, has physical part fat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, be important in diet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(meat, be important in diet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(meat, be important in diet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(meat, be important in diet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(meat, have more fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meat, have more fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(fast food, have calories)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fast food, have many calories)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hamburger, have calories)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(fast food, have calories)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(meat, have more fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fast food, have many calories)