meat: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.65
, fast food
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lunch meat
Weight: 0.80
, hamburger
Weight: 0.72
, lamb
Weight: 0.71
, beef
Weight: 0.69
, chicken
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
get more expensive 0.97
is expensive 0.94
get expensive 0.91
is expensive nowadays 0.89
is cheaper 0.86
is inefficient yet cheap 0.78
is inefficient cheap 0.77
be expensive in switzerland 0.77
be expensive in america 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fast food, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fast food, get expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(fast food, get expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is cheaper)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(beef, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fast food, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fast food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(meat, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beef, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beef, is more expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lamb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(lamb, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(beef, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(beef, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(meat, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(meat, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fast food, get expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(beef, is more expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lamb, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(beef, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is more expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fast food, is cheaper)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(meat, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fast food, get expensive)