mecca: be important to bedouin traders

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.58
, site
Weight: 0.54
, country
Weight: 0.47
, town
Weight: 0.46
Siblings paradise
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.33
, hub
Weight: 0.33
, oasis
Weight: 0.33
, mexico city
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to bedouin traders 1.00
was important to bedouin traders 1.00
was important to traders 0.87
was different from arab trading cities 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(mecca, was important to bedouin traders)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(mecca, was important to bedouin traders)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mecca, was important to traders)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mecca, was important to bedouin traders)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mecca, was important to traders)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mecca, was important to bedouin traders)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mecca, was important to traders)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(mecca, was different from arab trading cities)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(mecca, was different from arab trading cities)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(mecca, was different from arab trading cities)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mecca, was important to traders)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mecca, was different from arab trading cities)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mecca, be important to bedouin traders)