mechanic: be important in engineering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents specialist
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.60
, guy
Weight: 0.60
, element
Weight: 0.59
, expert
Weight: 0.59
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.35
, old man
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.34
, foreman
Weight: 0.34
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in engineering 1.00
be such important part of engineering 0.95
be important in physics 0.77
hate engineers 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mechanic, be important in engineering)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(mechanic, be such important part of engineering)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mechanic, be such important part of engineering)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(mechanic, be such important part of engineering)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(mechanic, hate engineers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, be such important part of engineering)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(mechanic, be important in physics)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(mechanic, hate engineers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mechanic, hate engineers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, hate engineers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mechanic, be important in physics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mechanic, be important in physics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, be important in physics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, be important in engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mechanic, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mechanic, be important in engineering)