mechanic: be important in physics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents specialist
Weight: 0.64
, man
Weight: 0.60
, guy
Weight: 0.60
, element
Weight: 0.59
, expert
Weight: 0.59
Siblings carpenter
Weight: 0.35
, old man
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.34
, foreman
Weight: 0.34
, policeman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in physics 1.00
use science 0.79
be important in engineering 0.77
be such important part of engineering 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(engineer, use science)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(engineer, use science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(mechanic, be important in physics)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mechanic, use science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(mechanic, use science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(mechanic, use science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mechanic, be important in engineering)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mechanic, be such important part of engineering)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mechanic, be important in engineering)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mechanic, be important in engineering)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(mechanic, be such important part of engineering)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(mechanic, be such important part of engineering)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, be such important part of engineering)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, be important in engineering)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, use science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, be important in physics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mechanic, be important in physics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(engineer, use science)