mechanical pencil: be at draft class

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pencil
Weight: 0.74
, item
Weight: 0.58
, instrument
Weight: 0.54
, tool
Weight: 0.54
, product
Weight: 0.53
Siblings fountain pen
Weight: 0.62
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.35
, notepad
Weight: 0.33
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.33
, graphite pencil
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at draft class 1.00
be use in draft 0.94
be used to write draft of document 0.88
be at set of draft tool 0.87
be at in class 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pencil, be at in class)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pencil, be used to write draft of document)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(pencil, be used to write draft of document)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pencil, be at in class)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pencil, be used to write draft of document)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pencil, be at in class)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pencil, be used to write draft of document)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(pencil, be at in class)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be use in draft)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be at set of draft tool)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(mechanical pencil, be use in draft)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mechanical pencil, be use in draft)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(mechanical pencil, be at set of draft tool)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be use in draft)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be at set of draft tool)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(mechanical pencil, be at set of draft tool)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(pencil, be used to write draft of document)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pencil, be at in class)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(pencil, be used to write draft of document)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(mechanical pencil, be at draft class)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pencil, be at in class)