mechanical pencil: be use by engineer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pencil
Weight: 0.74
, item
Weight: 0.58
, instrument
Weight: 0.54
, tool
Weight: 0.54
, product
Weight: 0.53
Siblings fountain pen
Weight: 0.62
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.35
, notepad
Weight: 0.33
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.33
, graphite pencil
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be use by engineer 1.00
be at engineer pocket protector 0.80
be at architect office 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be use by engineer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(mechanical pencil, be use by engineer)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be use by engineer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mechanical pencil, be at engineer pocket protector)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be use by engineer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(mechanical pencil, be at architect office)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(mechanical pencil, be use by engineer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(mechanical pencil, be at engineer pocket protector)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be use by engineer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be at engineer pocket protector)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(mechanical pencil, be use by engineer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be at engineer pocket protector)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(mechanical pencil, be use by engineer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be at architect office)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be use by engineer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be at architect office)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(mechanical pencil, be use by engineer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(mechanical pencil, be at architect office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(mechanical pencil, be use by engineer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be use by engineer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, be use by engineer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mechanical pencil, be use by engineer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, be use by engineer)