mechanical pencil: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pencil
Weight: 0.74
, item
Weight: 0.58
, instrument
Weight: 0.54
, tool
Weight: 0.54
, product
Weight: 0.53
Siblings fountain pen
Weight: 0.62
, pencil sharpener
Weight: 0.35
, notepad
Weight: 0.33
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.33
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(electric toothbrush, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mechanical pencil, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(electric toothbrush, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(electric toothbrush, has quality better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mechanical pencil, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fountain pen, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(fountain pen, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mechanical pencil, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(mechanical pencil, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(mechanical pencil, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(mechanical pencil, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(mechanical pencil, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric toothbrush, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mechanical pencil, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fountain pen, has quality better)