media: be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of miccroorganisms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reporting
Weight: 0.63
, strategy
Weight: 0.61
, group
Weight: 0.59
, behavior
Weight: 0.58
Siblings radio wave
Weight: 0.68
, reuters
Weight: 0.62
, newspaper
Weight: 0.61
, pop music
Weight: 0.61
, print
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of miccroorganisms 1.00
be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation 1.00
be preferable to chemically defined media for cultivation 0.97
be preferable to chemically defined media for cultivation of miccroorganisms 0.97
be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of microorganisms 0.96
be preferable to defined media for routine cultivation of miccroorganisms 0.96
be preferable to defined media for routine cultivation 0.96
be preferable to defined media for routine cultivation of microorganisms 0.94
be preferable to chemically defined media for cultivation of microorganisms 0.94
be preferable to media for routine cultivation 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(media, be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of miccroorganisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(media, be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of miccroorganisms)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(media, be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of miccroorganisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(media, be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of microorganisms)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(media, be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of miccroorganisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(media, be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of microorganisms)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(media, be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of miccroorganisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(media, be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of microorganisms)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(media, be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of miccroorganisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(media, be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of microorganisms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(media, be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of miccroorganisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(media, be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of miccroorganisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(media, be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of miccroorganisms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(media, be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of miccroorganisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(media, be preferable to chemically defined media for routine cultivation of miccroorganisms)