median: be best measure of center

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents measure
Weight: 0.58
, estimate
Weight: 0.52
, percentile
Weight: 0.52
, distribution
Weight: 0.50
, value
Weight: 0.50
Siblings increase
Weight: 0.30
, equity
Weight: 0.30
, comparison
Weight: 0.29
, variance
Weight: 0.29
, projection
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best measure of center 1.00
be used measure 0.84
has physical part center 0.81
be poor measure of risk 0.78
be better measure of central tendency 0.78
be better measure of tendency 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(distribution, has physical part center)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(median, be best measure of center)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(distribution, has physical part center)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(distribution, has physical part center)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(variance, be poor measure of risk)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(variance, be used measure)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(distribution, has physical part center)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(median, be best measure of center)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(variance, be used measure)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(variance, be used measure)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(variance, be poor measure of risk)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(variance, be poor measure of risk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(median, be best measure of center)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(median, be better measure of central tendency)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(median, be better measure of tendency)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(median, be better measure of central tendency)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(median, be better measure of tendency)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(median, be better measure of central tendency)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(median, be better measure of tendency)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(median, be better measure of central tendency)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(median, be better measure of tendency)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(median, be best measure of center)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(median, be best measure of center)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(distribution, has physical part center)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(variance, be used measure)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(variance, be poor measure of risk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(median, be best measure of center)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(distribution, has physical part center)