median: be better measure of central tendency

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents measure
Weight: 0.58
, estimate
Weight: 0.52
, percentile
Weight: 0.52
, distribution
Weight: 0.50
, value
Weight: 0.50
Siblings increase
Weight: 0.30
, equity
Weight: 0.30
, comparison
Weight: 0.29
, variance
Weight: 0.29
, projection
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better measure of central tendency 1.00
be better measure of tendency 0.96
be poor measure of risk 0.79
be used measure 0.79
be best measure of center 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(variance, be poor measure of risk)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(variance, be used measure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(variance, be poor measure of risk)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(variance, be poor measure of risk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(variance, be used measure)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(variance, be used measure)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(median, be better measure of central tendency)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(median, be better measure of tendency)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(median, be better measure of tendency)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(median, be better measure of tendency)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(median, be better measure of tendency)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(median, be best measure of center)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(median, be best measure of center)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(median, be best measure of center)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(median, be best measure of center)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(median, be better measure of central tendency)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(median, be better measure of central tendency)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(variance, be used measure)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(median, be better measure of central tendency)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(variance, be poor measure of risk)