median: be better measure of tendency

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents measure
Weight: 0.58
, estimate
Weight: 0.52
, percentile
Weight: 0.52
, distribution
Weight: 0.50
, value
Weight: 0.50
Siblings increase
Weight: 0.30
, equity
Weight: 0.30
, comparison
Weight: 0.29
, variance
Weight: 0.29
, projection
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better measure of tendency 1.00
be better measure of central tendency 0.96
be used measure 0.81
be poor measure of risk 0.80
be best measure of center 0.76
be used as measures of risk 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(variance, be poor measure of risk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(variance, be used as measures of risk)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(variance, be used measure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(variance, be used measure)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(variance, be used measure)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(variance, be poor measure of risk)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(variance, be poor measure of risk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(variance, be used as measures of risk)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(variance, be used as measures of risk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(median, be better measure of tendency)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(median, be better measure of central tendency)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(median, be better measure of central tendency)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(median, be better measure of central tendency)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(median, be better measure of central tendency)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(median, be best measure of center)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(median, be best measure of center)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(median, be best measure of center)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(median, be best measure of center)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(median, be better measure of tendency)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(median, be better measure of tendency)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(variance, be used measure)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(variance, be poor measure of risk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(median, be better measure of tendency)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(variance, be used as measures of risk)