median: be used for ordinal data

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents measure
Weight: 0.58
, estimate
Weight: 0.52
, percentile
Weight: 0.52
, distribution
Weight: 0.50
, value
Weight: 0.50
Siblings increase
Weight: 0.30
, equity
Weight: 0.30
, comparison
Weight: 0.29
, variance
Weight: 0.29
, projection
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used for ordinal data 1.00
be used for data 0.82
be reduced in large data sets 0.76
be reduced in data sets 0.76
be determined both in data 0.76
be adjusted to ppp 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(value, be adjusted to ppp)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(median, be used for ordinal data)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(value, be adjusted to ppp)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(value, be adjusted to ppp)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(variance, be reduced in large data sets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(variance, be reduced in data sets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(value, be adjusted to ppp)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(median, be used for ordinal data)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(variance, be reduced in large data sets)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(variance, be reduced in large data sets)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(variance, be reduced in data sets)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(variance, be reduced in data sets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(median, be used for ordinal data)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(median, be used for data)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(median, be used for data)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(median, be used for data)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(median, be determined both in data)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(median, be determined both in data)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(median, be determined both in data)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(median, be used for data)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(median, be determined both in data)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(median, be used for ordinal data)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(median, be used for ordinal data)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(value, be adjusted to ppp)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(variance, be reduced in data sets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(variance, be reduced in large data sets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(median, be used for ordinal data)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(value, be adjusted to ppp)