median: best represent data

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents measure
Weight: 0.58
, estimate
Weight: 0.52
, percentile
Weight: 0.52
, distribution
Weight: 0.50
, value
Weight: 0.50
Siblings increase
Weight: 0.30
, equity
Weight: 0.30
, comparison
Weight: 0.29
, variance
Weight: 0.29
, projection
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
best represent data 1.00
be used for data 0.83
be determined both in data 0.81
be funny in single data set 0.78
be funny in data set 0.78
be reduced in large data sets 0.76
be reduced in data sets 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(variance, be reduced in large data sets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(variance, be reduced in data sets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(variance, be reduced in large data sets)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(variance, be reduced in large data sets)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(variance, be reduced in data sets)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(variance, be reduced in data sets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(median, best represent data)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(median, be used for data)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(median, be determined both in data)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(median, be used for data)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(median, be used for data)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(median, be funny in data set)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(median, be funny in single data set)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(median, be determined both in data)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(median, be determined both in data)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(median, be funny in data set)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(median, be funny in data set)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(median, be funny in single data set)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(median, be funny in single data set)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(median, be used for data)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(median, be determined both in data)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(median, be funny in data set)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(median, be funny in single data set)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(median, best represent data)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(median, best represent data)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(variance, be reduced in data sets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(median, best represent data)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(variance, be reduced in large data sets)