medusa: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.63
, monster
Weight: 0.63
, boss
Weight: 0.48
, thing
Weight: 0.46
, god
Weight: 0.42
Siblings creature
Weight: 0.35
, spider man
Weight: 0.34
, dragon
Weight: 0.34
, hydra
Weight: 0.34
, cyclops
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
was dangerous 0.97
was scary 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(medusa, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cyclops, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(medusa, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(cyclops, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cyclops, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(medusa, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(medusa, is dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(medusa, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(medusa, was dangerous)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(medusa, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(medusa, was dangerous)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(medusa, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(medusa, was dangerous)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(medusa, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(medusa, was dangerous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(medusa, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(medusa, was scary)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(medusa, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(medusa, was scary)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(medusa, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(medusa, was scary)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(medusa, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(medusa, was scary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(medusa, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(medusa, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(medusa, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(medusa, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(medusa, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(medusa, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cyclops, is dangerous)