meeting: is gosh darn difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents forum
Weight: 0.70
, topic
Weight: 0.66
, demonstration
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.60
Siblings hearing
Weight: 0.67
, gathering
Weight: 0.67
, visit
Weight: 0.64
, encounter
Weight: 0.63
, retreat
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
is gosh darn difficult 1.00
is gosh darn expensive 0.98
is gosh difficult 0.96
is gosh expensive 0.94
is darn difficult 0.93
is darn expensive 0.89
be really freaking slow 0.85
be really freaking connecting 0.79
is thing 0.77
CAN good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(event, be really freaking connecting)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(event, be really freaking slow)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(event, be really freaking slow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(event, be really freaking connecting)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(event, be really freaking slow)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(event, be really freaking connecting)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(event, be really freaking connecting)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(event, be really freaking slow)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(meeting, is gosh difficult)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(meeting, is gosh difficult)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(meeting, is darn difficult)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(meeting, is gosh difficult)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is gosh difficult)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(meeting, is darn difficult)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(meeting, is darn difficult)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is darn difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(event, be really freaking slow)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(event, be really freaking connecting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(event, be really freaking slow)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(meeting, is gosh darn difficult)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(event, be really freaking connecting)